2.11.07

110SPORT 'VICTIMS OF SMEAR CAMPAIGN'

110sport, who manage Stephen Hendry, Ronnie O'Sullivan and Ken Doherty among others, have issued the following statement:

110sport Management Ltd, snooker’s biggest management group, have reason to believe they are victims of a smear campaign which has been directed against them by certain individuals form within the snooker fraternity.

Spokesman for 110sport, Stewart Weir said; “We became aware of this a number of weeks ago, firstly through the grapevine and latterly when we started receiving telephone calls from several newspapers.

“Once we had explained the situation to these newspapers, they decided in their best interests not to run with the story.

“However, the individuals who have instigated this campaign, and who we know are from the Yorkshire area and the Isle of Man , have persisted with their attempt to blacken our name and reputation by touting the same story around the newspaper world.

“Their claim, and not necessarily those of the players they have listed, is that several of our former clients have complaints concerning how they were managed during their time with our company.

“What we would say to those players, even after several years outside of our management, we would be willing to discuss those grievances. However, if they feel strongly enough, we would happily see them in a court of law, an option which has been open to them all along.

“We would also say that, if any financial claims are made against our company, counter-claims would be issued immediately.

“110sport are also adamant that if these underhand tactics continue against our company, we will forward our dossier on to both legal and snooker authorities.”

2 comments:

andy said...

Wow! What a strange statement for a company to make if nothing has been said publicly against them. I assume none of the alleged defamatory remarks are as yet public!!??

And this sentence doesn't make much sense:

"What we would say to those players, even after several years outside of our management, we would be willing to discuss those grievances. However, if they feel strongly enough, we would happily see them in a court of law, an option which has been open to them all along."

It sounds like they're willing to discuss grievances, and then the next sentence says they would be happy to see them in a court of law!! Talk about waving a red rag to a bull!! :-)

Dave, is it possible you can shed more light on any of this (directly or indirectly ;-) )?

Thanks,

Andy

Dave H said...

Not a clue, I'm afraid, although I agree with the 'put up or shut up' sentiments